The world was at the intersection at the end of the 20th and beginning of the 21st century, where globalization gainers recorded accelerated economic growth, while losers fell into a deep crisis from which no means could emerge. In order to get out of the crisis, economic growth is needed, at least to alleviate poverty and inequality if it can not be completely eradicated. We can say that globalization today is carried out on three main sides: the United States, Europe and Japan. In globalization, each of these three sides "holds" its own part. Europe has a historic championship and a traditional cultural level, the United States has dominant natural and capital assets, and Japan has production and technological innovations. About this triangle of power and wealth is networked the rest of the world in a way that organizes its own economy. Based on the above, it is very easy to conclude that the West is implementing globalization by ensuring its unequal share in the benefits it brings, at the expense of developing countries. Those who attack globalization often ignore its positive effects. But the arguments of the proponents of globalization are even more unbalanced. For them, globalization (which is usually associated with the acceptance of American capitalism's victorious capitalism) is progress and developing countries must accept if they want to grow and effectively combat poverty. But many developing countries have not brought promised economic benefits to globalization. The greater the difference between those who have and those who do not have more and more people in the Third World in extreme poverty, in conditions where they live with less than $ 1 a day. Despite the frequent promises given in the last decade of the 20th century that poverty will be reduced, the real number of poor people grew by almost 100 million.